The BBC reports that Ministers and the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) believe culling badgers will curb TB in cattle. Ms Truss, the Minister claimed the government’s “comprehensive strategy” was supported by leading vets.
But protesters have claimed independent monitoring has been dropped and attempted to have the cull halted at the High Court.
The move was rejected by judges, after which the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said: “We have always been clear that the independent expert panel’s role was to oversee the six-week pilots in the first year of the culls only.
“This year we have made changes to monitor effectiveness and humaneness and the culls will be independently audited.”
An independent report by the expert panel into the first year of culls found that “controlled shooting” of free-running badgers could not deliver the level of culling needed to lower TB cases in cattle and was not humane.
Try as we might we are unable to offer any link to any science which underpins the Minister or the NFUs ‘belief’. Having said that one might reason you don’t actually need evidence, let alone allow it to be peer reviewed to ‘believe’? What motivates Ministers? The abiding memory for many will be the u-turn on the ‘independent monitoring’ of the culls? Like so many promises made by politicians, it seems to have fallen by the wayside once the spotlight had been distracted towards other topical issues?
What really saddens us here in the Doncaster area, which is as far as we are aware a bTB free zone, is the systematic destruction of badger setts. Whilst it was pleasant to spend the afternoon in the field so to speak, it was far from pleasant to witness the loss of another sett in the district. The sett on agricultural land, accessed via quiet country lanes with locked barriers, was also in view of distant properties. A large sett with a number of active entrance holes had been well and truly dug. Even the hardened badger workers were quite shocked at the sheer extent of the ‘diggers’ activity.
What was apparent was the length of time the ‘diggers’ would have been at the site to have dug at least seven of the holes and one of them to considerable depth. What surprised me but was readily explained by one of the group was the absence of badgers, or parts thereof! Apparently a live badger for baiting and the associated gambling is worth around £800! So, it followed that they would have carted off as many as they could. That in itself would have been a particularly interesting logistical operation and one requiring a team of strong individuals, cages and in all likelihood a vehicle. No one saw a thing?
What really hit home as well, was the inhumanity that had to be inherent in the individuals engaged in such activity. The sows would either be heavily pregnant at this time of year or they would have recently given birth. If the ‘diggers’ didn’t reach a sow then the chances are such that the stress level would cause her to either abort or to kill the cubs.
The loss of this group pushes the ‘Doncaster’ population to the brink of extinction. As groups are lost to areas, any remaining become isolated and weakened by inbreeding as there are no neighbouring groups to recruit from or to join. Brock an iconic mammal of the quintessential British Countryside could be lost to us in a couple of years or so in the Doncaster area if the current persecution rate continues.
The other aspect which was quite noticable was the damage to the agricultural land, albeit in the main, the headland. However the digging had clearly encroached onto land which would in due course be worked by large and expensive machinery. The site had been left a mess and the landowner was left with reparation of his land to return it to a safe state, in order to work it, come time to harvest the crop.
Whilst badgers might elicit mixed feelings across the spectrum of emotions, such activity is against the law and it certainly appears to constitute tresspass aggravated by possible criminal damage. Factor in the local ‘intel’ that gangs of criminals are working rural areas, it seems reasonable that there could be benefit from collaborative working?
Please if anyone sees anything suspicious, then please do report it to the police via 101 or to the South Yorkshire Badger Group. Please, remember it is important to report the crime to the proper authorities as soon as possible. If calling the police (in an emergency use 999, otherwise use 101) ask to speak to a Wildlife Crime Officer (WCO) and make sure to get an Incident Report number.
An excellent site which makes much useful information available is Birders Against Wildlife Crime. They have an excellent ‘motto’ Recognise, Record & Report! Similarly the Badger Trust website has regular updates on the situation and Government stance.
ePetitioning for protection from persecution (aka ‘campaign corner’):
Mountain Hares are killed in large numbers on grouse moors because they carry ticks that might affect Red Grouse numbers. The shooting industry doesn’t want Red Grouse to die of tick-borne diseases – instead they want them to die by being shot by paying customers on grouse moors. Much other wildlife is an inconvenient presence including Mountain Hares and raptors, notably Hen Harriers.
asks Scottish Natural Heritage
to protect this native species from persecution from the shooting industry. SNH
is concerned about this issue but has only asked for voluntary restraint from grouse shooting. We struggle to recollect voluntary codes or guidelines which have worked, two examples which spring to mind and might illustrate that suggestion are the reduction of peat in growing media and MPs sorting out their own expenses?
, an excellent wildlife charity, is asking for support for a tiny spider only known to live in a couple of sites in the world – one of which maybe destroyed by house building. A planning enquiry starts next week so any signatures gained by this epetition
will help to demonstrate public support for thisapparently insignificant spider (size isn’t everything in nature). Whilst the epetition is about a rare spider, the bigger issue appears to be that of a planning system which is in such of a ‘pickle’?
Then this really is just in case …. you don’t know that there is an e-petition to ban driven grouse shooting
that has stirred things up quite a bit over the last few months. It passed the 20,000 signature mark before Christmas and every further signature is valuable in the run-in to the general election campaign.