Environmental conservation has a bit of competition at the moment in terms of newsworthiness, but then that’s probably always been the case to some degree?
Politics has suddenly become lively and isn’t it interesting to see the antics of the Parliamentary playground? The humanitarian crisis continues to unfold and that of course suffers from media hype, political commentory, filibustering rather than a collective address across the piece be it at local, national or worldwide level?
Nature, quietly going about its business, so essential to all humanity is in the back seat again? Possibly even demoted to the trailer behind?
There have been a few entertaining bits on the worldwideweb recently? Andy Richardson / the Countryside Alliance petition calling upon the BBC to “Sack Chris Packham” is limping along with 2,629 supporters. Packham’s team have thus far fielded a spectacular 76,130 on the “BBC Don’t Sack Chris Packham” counter petition. Packham’s video thanking people for their support also encourages people to join the various charities he called upon / criticised for being too meek, it also importantly asks that they consider signing the Ban driven grouse shooting epetition, it may be coincidental but the numbers have risen at the rate of around 1,500 a day and it currently stands at around 18,823. The petition has until 21 January 2016 to run, if it reaches the ‘magic’ figure of 100,000 signatories then it “will be considered for debate in Parliament”.
In an article in yesterday’s Independent, the BBC make it clear that Packham would not face dismissal for expressing his views. Excellent news, freedom of speech survives a little longer? a new nature blog provides interesting background information on the Countryside Alliance and its associates. It also analyses recent activity by government amidst the excitement and confusion of current affairs.
See also the Hen Harrier Day 2015 video, Packham at his best and promoting peaceful, proactive and democratic campaigns. He even welcomes those who would attack him at all levels whilst failing to provide any credible science to underpin the view of ‘tradition & country lore’. There is just one blip, ok possibly two needed for sensitive ears but they received hearty rounds of applause.
Packham’s committment to the campaign is assisted by his generous provision of an assortment of T-Shirt designs which he allows supporters to use, his website explains ….
You can download th[e] design for free for your own personal use. Please be aware that it is the copyright of Chris Packham and strictly not for resale. Action will be taken against any infringement of copyright.
Poisoned, shot, trapped – Hen Harrier RIP
This Hen Harrier t-shirt design has been created by Chris Packham and is free to download so that you can take it to your chosen printers and have made up in the colour and size of your choice.
Packham, sporting the above design (along with Avery) reminded the Goyt Valley audience in the open air arena that the management of the uplands were not best served by driven grouse shooting interests. Cleaning water for human consumption is more expensive because of heather burning, there is also a risk of increased flooding, see the EMBER Report to better understand the effects of prescribed vegetation burning on blanket peatland hydrology, chemistry and physical properties, and on the hydrology, water quality and biota of rivers in upland peat-dominated catchments. It is the first time that a systematic and comprehensive assessment of burned and unburned catchments has been carried out.
Inglorious is the ideal Ban driven grouse shooting handbook, in its pages are all the details of everything you need to know when contacting your MP, defra, food chain suppliers and restaurants etc. to make a case for it to be outlawed. It offers excellent references as well as further reading matter. As Packham said recently “I’m a fully paid up member of this newfangled thing we’ve got. It’s called science and it’s about truth”.