We oft hear of hedgerows and field ponds being an intrinsic part of the rural landscape. Fishlake Parish in the Borough of Doncaster had many delightful such features. Howes (1997) catalogued the decline of these features and we now mourn the passing of another ….
A pond such as this below in a quiet corner could assist alleviate the impact of flooding, it could be useful when biodiversity value of a land holding is assessed?
Had this pond been checked for Great Crested Newts? Had the local planning authority, that is to say Doncaster MBC, been asked about the presence of any protected species within the vicinity via their Local Records Centre? Had the Environment Agency been contacted?
Crucially, had permission been sought for the use of barrier bank soil to infill it? If so who was involved in any ‘discussion’? Had Danvm Drainage Commissioners as the Public Body responsible for drainage matters in the area been involved?
What risk assessment had been undertaken which determined that there was no need for this bank in terms of flood management? It seems wholly reasonable that given the low lying nature of the area that features were installed or created for a reason and if that was now redundant then it would receive approval from the appropriate authority for an alternative use? Who was and who is now that appropriate authority or agency?
Does the landowner involved receive stewardship payments for the feature (ie the pond)?
The function of the IDBs is land drainage and their powers are through the Land Drainage Act 1991 (as amended), it is the Environment Agency who is responsible for flood prevention/alleviation/mitigation etc.
In the words of Gerald Manley Hopkins “Oh let there be left wildness and wet; long live the weeds and the wilderness yet”?
What will be left of a once pastoral landscape for the next generation, some would say it’s progress and for landowners to do as they wish with their own property? As oft the case, much is underpinned with public funds. IDBs receive significant sums via a levy collected through the local authority and there is reported to be an expectation of public benefit for those funds. IDBs have Biodiversity Action Plans for their catchments, but these are often little more than words and tangible outputs from the expenditure is as scarce as field ponds? The DDC website offers an array of BAPs, the relevant BAP Pond and Great Crested Newt Action Report (2014) simply details a survey of a couple of sites, not a catchment survey, and no actions so one might be forgiven for pondering the claim of BAP ‘implementation’? Implementation would generally mean tangible activity post assessment? Do the local IDBs have any biodiversity inventory relating to the areas managed by them, it would seem reasonable given that the management service provision would at least hold a baseline inventory of protected species as a minimum with periodic updates? Parallels could be drawn where nature conservation organisations (both charitable and statutory) do hold relevant data material to their management function of land and water courses? How else can they deliver appropriate management without an asset register of key biodiversity interest?