Should New Year Resolutions be a personal issue or can organisations take them up? Perhaps organisations call them Business Reviews, wonder what politicians call them?
The author of this post decided to start the year proactively and whilst not a serious NYD list, a few species of note were recorded making the short excursion worthwhile and carbon neutral by virtue of cycling ….
Stunning views of two Short-eared Owls hunting over arable grassland reverting to scrub, very wet and waterlogged in the lower areas of the field, ideal small mammal habitat.
Image copyright: Tim Melling
The same field, in a drier area, provided a sheltered microhabitat for Viola arvensis or field pansy, something agri-industrialists would consider a weed. But on a cool ‘winter’ day quiet delightful.
Viola arvensis: Field Pansy flowering on New Year’s Day 2016
So, in terms of ‘New Year Resolutions’ that ticked the
*Get out more and enjoy the wildlife / spend ‘moor’ time out in the field recording findings,
*Reduce carbon footprint (including continued *cutting back on ‘commercial’ meat),
*Focus on a couple of key ‘conservation’ themes to ‘campaign’ on, research them thoroughly to ensure up to speed with the current science involved to underpin case. Topical issues at the moment might include climate change and what better example to use than the recent flooding episodes and the role of the various agencies and drainage boards? The use of and impact of neonictinoids on pollinators? Equally topical might be fracking? It might be badger culls or illegal persecution of raptors (particularly Hen Harriers)? In case any reader hasn’t signed the epetition ‘Ban driven grouse shooting’ then that might be a topic to consider? Management of upland moors (burning) for grouse has been shown to be damaging for water supplies as well as other eco-system services, see Leeds University’s EMBER Report Effects of Moorland Burning on the Ecohydrology of River basins. For background reading an informative and well researched book Inglorious Conflict in the Uplands provides a good understanding and a starting point for further investigation into a sport which has cost implications for all tax payers.
*Enter into ‘regular’ correspondence with a variety of ‘people’. Ministers, Defra officers, media, MEPs, MPs, local councillors etc. Write a minimum of one letter a month to relevant MP / Minister (ial Department).
*I suppose we might / should also consider taking up ‘Twitter (ing)‘? I recall an audience being told, or at least those who didn’t to ‘get over it’ and effectively get on with it …. whilst I recognise the gains made through the use of ‘Social Media’ I’m not entirely convinced that it is something for us, but ever an agnostic? Rural internet is sadly still none existent in parts of God’s own county and its hinterlands, so blogging isn’t as easy as it ought to be, twitter and tweeting – I thought that was something the birds did?
*There has been suggestions made that one should review the NGOs you support, and there has to be merit in periodic reviews of this nature because there are the large, medium and small or for those sufficiently motivated there’s always the option to DIY if a gap exists? Whilst the large can have impact through advocacy on some key issues, they may not help local community groups protect locally important sites. The regular direct debit becomes a habit. Regional offers or specialist organisation can help you learn identification skills and can confirm difficult identifications, and are valuable networking opportunities and generally appreciate contributions from volunteers. It’s not a case of what you receive but what wildlife receives for your contribution and some it has been suggested spend too much on recruitment, PR and spin through regular press releases? Conversely, they can be a force for change?
*Remembering the late Stephen Warburton, one of the Forum’s founding members, we should remain true to those principles, particularly Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
*Enthuse the next generation of wildlife enthusiasts / amateur naturalists. Once upon a time, that would almost certainly have been deemed to be children and whilst that is important, there is a resource with considerable capacity that could take up natural history as a hobby and or conservation campaigning to influence change etc. and they are the early retired proportion of the population. We should be promoting wildlife and natural landscapes as important habitats at any and every opportunity. If we don’t then they will be lost to agri-industrial intensification, to green belt development or mono-culture commercial theme / country parks?
So a few for nature conservationists to consider?
Here’s to 2016 – challenges and opportunities it’s sure to bring?