Posts Tagged ‘tony juniper’

Campaign updates & not so Scarce Footmen

July 8, 2014

CAMPAIGN UPDATES:

Syngenta’s attempt to undermine the EU pesticides ban has caused public uproar in the past few days. When the pesticide company applied to the Government for the go-ahead to use banned chemicals on UK crops, a number of organisations stepped in and called upon the public to help.  FOE and others report that ….

Thousands of us emailed the Bees Minister over the weekend and, as a result of this and the work of brilliant bee-loving allies such as Buglife, we think Syngenta and the Government have truly been feeling the pressure. [On 4 July] we found out that Syngenta have withdrawn their application.

This is fantastic news for our bees. It means the most bee-harming pesticides will not be used in the UK this year.

Syngenta say they’ll try again next year – but we’ll be ready for them.

 

Should LEGO advertise for Shell, a multinational seeking to exploit the Arctic?

There is currently a Greenpeace campaign to persuade Shell to reconsider its plans for exploitation of the Arctic for oil.  They have also raised the issue of advertising through ‘Lego’ toys, so are asking people to sign a petition to Lego to persuade them to reconsider helping Shell present itself as a family friendly and caring company.

 

‘MOOR’ GROUSING ….

Another ‘plug’ to those who might still be undecided and considering whether or not to sign Dr Mark Avery‘s epetition Ban driven grouse shooting.  Currently standing at 7.018 – can we get it to the 10,000 by the ‘inglorious’ 12th August?  Updates and background information can be found on his excellent blog Standing up for Nature.   

 

I’ve recently been reading Tony Juniper‘s What has nature ever done for us?   I think I’d suggest that it needs to be compulsory reading for all 1450 residents of the Westminster village.  Perhaps Kirsty Young should make it a compulsory companion when she interviews politicians and similar professions on R4’s Desert Island Discs?

 

NATURE NOTES:

The changeable weather recently has curtailed a little, my endeavours to boost my ‘backyard’ moth list …. but a recent addition to the list is shown below alongside its more common cousin.

Easy when they're side by side.  Eilema complana (top) and E. lurideola (bottom).

Easy when they’re side by side. Eilema complana (top) and E. lurideola (bottom).

The Scarce Footman has, in my view a completely different ‘jizz’ to that of the more frequently encountered Common Footman.  It was a pleasant find, there were two amidst more plentiful cousins and whilst not as ‘rare’ as it’s name suggests it is not a particularly common species yet …. although, according to Harry Beaumont (YNU Lepidoptera Recorder for ‘Micros’) Scarce Footman has turned up frequently during the past few years, with the records slowly making it onto the Yorkshire Moths website.  After VC61, VC63 holds the second largest number of unique sites and individuals.

 

The culls continue ….

May 24, 2013

The UK Government agency responsible for nature conservation appears to be attracting a lot of press coverage recently. Sadly, it is for all the wrong reasons. I seem to recall that Natural England once had a strap line describing themselves as being the guardians of the countryside but I may be mistaken. There are a few rare species, gems within their ranks but they are in decline and as difficult to save as the nations diminishing wildlife. Three quite damming articles have appeared in the last two days.

On the 22 May Tony Juniper writes about the anti nature narrative being hard to fathom. Juniper like many hardened campaigners and advocates for environmental conservation, is not expecting the ‘ConDem’ Government to strengthen wildlife protection after the reveiew of EU environment laws. Given the language used in the Terms of Reference it’s easy to see how anyone could fail to draw the same conclusion.

Then on the following day, 23 May Damien Carrington writes about Goverment licensing to cull raptors, a historic precedent without any public consultation.

Then the other item by Leo Hickman reveals more wildlife culls.

Much of the information upon which the articles are based has been secured through Freedom of Information requests made by the media or the RSPB. It may be that if this continues, that FoI legislation might be the next target for review and reform, perhaps it already is?

Clearly the role of Natural England is already seeing a change of emphasis ahead of any formal announcement of the outcome of the recent Triennial Review. The jury is still out (perhaps), but interim indications can be found on official Government websites.

There is also some excellent opportunities for business to negotiate favourable outcomes if they make early approaches to the Governments advisers, ‘discretionary advice’ comes at a price but its all relative if it avoids a costly EIA required under EU regulations. NE will advise how to mitigate first which will avoid, in the words of the Chancellor George Osbourne “ridiculous burden on business'”.

If there were a referendum, a public vote, would the “Muzzled Watchdog” be put out of its misery and culled? Its certainly a good lapdog these days, helping developers, assisting landowners – I must look up its statutory duties, unless they too have been culled?


BIRDING SITE GUIDE - Birding Site Guide

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Hatfield Moors Birding Blog

Bird and other wildlife information service for Hatfield Moors, South Yorkshire, UK © HMBSG 17/11/2010

Mark Avery

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

a new nature blog

I write about politics, nature + the environment. Some posts are serious, some not. These are my views, I don't do any promotional stuff and these views are not being expressed for anyone who employs me.

UK and Ireland Natural History Bloggers

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?